Lawyer Hatch LawyerHatch
Menu
Home/ CLAT Previous Year Question Papers (2018–2025)

CLAT Previous Year Question Papers (2018–2025)

Past papers are the single most honest picture of CLAT you will ever get. This is how to read the 2020 format shift, and how to turn eight years of papers into rank.

8
years of papers
2020
the format shift
120 Q
in 120 min
+1 / −0.25
marking
Take a past paper as a mock →

If you do only one thing to prepare for CLAT, make it this: solve the CLAT previous year question papers properly. Not skim them. Not read the answer keys. Solve them — timed, on the real exam screen, then dissect every mistake. Eight years of papers, from 2018 to 2025, sit right here on this page. They are the closest thing to the real exam you will touch before exam day.

📌 Why past papers beat every guidebook
A guidebook tells you what CLAT might ask. A past paper shows you what CLAT actually asked — the real passage length, the real difficulty, the exact question style and the way options are written to tempt you. No coaching material can fake that. The papers are the syllabus made real.

This guide does two things. First, it explains the one fact that changes how you should use these papers — the big 2020 format shift that turned CLAT from a fact-recall test into a fully comprehension-based exam. Second, it gives you a precise method to squeeze maximum learning out of each paper, plus a calm word on negative marking.

Download CLAT question papers (free PDF, 2018–2025)

Here are all eight official CLAT previous year question papers — free to download as PDFs, each with its answer key. Download a paper to print and solve on paper, or tap Attempt online to take that exact year as a timed mock on the real exam screen with instant scoring and solutions.

YearQuestionsFormatQuestion paperAnswer keyAttempt online
2025120Passage-basedPDF ⬇PDF ⬇Attempt →
2024120Passage-basedPDF ⬇PDF ⬇Attempt →
2023150Passage-basedPDF ⬇PDF ⬇Attempt →
2022150Passage-basedPDF ⬇PDF ⬇Attempt →
2021150Passage-basedPDF ⬇PDF ⬇Attempt →
2020150Passage-basedPDF ⬇PDF ⬇Attempt →
2019200Standalone MCQsPDF ⬇Attempt →
2018200Standalone MCQsPDF ⬇PDF ⬇Attempt →
ℹ️ Source & answer keys
All papers are the official Consortium of NLUs CLAT UG question papers, with provisional answer keys, shared free for educational practice. Papers from 2020 onward follow the current comprehension format; 2018–2019 use the older 150-question standalone pattern.

Why PYQs are the most valuable resource you have

Every CLAT aspirant collects resources — books, video lectures, note bundles. Most of it is noise. The previous year papers are signal. They are the only material written by the people who set the exam, tested on the students who actually sat it. Everything else is someone's guess about that reality.

The paper is the truest teacher. Everything else is a commentary on it.

— How toppers actually use PYQs

There is a deeper reason too. CLAT changes slowly but it does change, and the papers record exactly how. Read the 2018 paper next to the 2024 paper and you can see the exam evolve — which tells you which papers to trust most as a guide to today's pattern.

The big change: CLAT before and after 2020

Here is the most important thing on this page. CLAT was redesigned for the 2020 cycle. Before that, the paper leaned heavily on direct, static, single-fact questions — name the article, recall the case, remember the GK fact, solve the standalone sum. From 2020 onwards, the Consortium of NLUs rebuilt the exam to be fully comprehension-based across all five sections. Every question now hangs off a passage you read on the spot.

This is not a small tweak. It changes what the exam rewards. The old paper rewarded a good memory and a stock of facts. The new paper rewards reading speed, comprehension and application — reading an unseen passage and reasoning from it under time pressure. A student who only memorises will sink in the post-2020 format; a student who reads and reasons well will swim.

Pre-2020 (2018–2019)Post-2020 (2020–2025)
Question styleDirect, static, single-fact recallPassage-based; read then apply
Legal ReasoningOften tested knowledge of lawPrinciple given in passage; apply it
GK / Current AffairsOne-line factual questionsNews passage + linked questions
EnglishGrammar, fill-ups, standalone bitsComprehension passages only
QuantStandalone sumsData passage / graph + questions
What it rewardsMemory and stocked factsReading, comprehension, application
Best used forReading & concept practiceThe truest guide to today's pattern
📌 The rule for choosing papers
Treat 2020 onwards as the truest guide to today's CLAT — same comprehension format, same demands. Use 2018 and 2019 mainly for reading practice and concept revision, not as a pattern guide. The old papers are still useful brain-food; they are just not a mirror of the modern exam.

So how do you actually use the two kinds of paper? Treat them as different tools for different jobs.

⚠️ Don't judge yourself by the 2018 paper
Some students panic when they score oddly on the 2018 or 2019 paper. Neither a low nor a high score there tells you much about your post-2020 readiness. Judge yourself on the 2020-onwards papers; use the older ones to train, not to grade yourself.

How to actually use a past paper

Most students waste their PYQs. They open a paper, glance at a few questions, peek at the answers, and move on. That learns almost nothing. A past paper is worth ten times more when you treat it as a closed-loop training exercise. Here is the method that turns one paper into real improvement.

  1. 1
    Take it once, strictly timed, on the real exam screen
    Sit the whole paper in one go — 120 questions, 120 minutes, no breaks, no phone, no checking answers midway. Use the actual exam-screen interface so the navigation, the flagging and the scrolling all feel familiar. The first attempt is sacred: it is the only honest reading you will get of your real speed and accuracy.
  2. 2
    Analyse every wrong answer — and why the passage pointed elsewhere
    This is where the marks are made. For each mistake, do not just read the correct option. Go back to the passage and find the exact line that proves the right answer, and the exact line that should have warned you off your choice. Name the cause: misread the passage, fell for a tempting option, missed a 'not/except' stem, or ran out of time. Log it.
  3. 3
    Redo the passages you misread
    Take the passages that tripped you up and attempt their questions again, slowly, with no clock. The goal is to retrain your reading so the same passage type never beats you twice. If you can now see why the answer is forced by the text, the lesson has landed.
  4. 4
    Track section-wise accuracy over time
    Record your accuracy in each of the five sections for every paper you sit. Watch the trend across papers, not the single score. A rising Legal Reasoning accuracy and a stubborn Quant accuracy tell you exactly where the next week's effort should go. The trend line is your real progress report.
💡 One paper, three passes
Pass 1 is the timed attempt. Pass 2 is the cold analysis of every error against the passage. Pass 3, a few days later, is a re-attempt of just the questions you got wrong. A paper put through all three passes teaches more than five papers skimmed once.
Sit a real past paper, exam-screen and all
Take any year's CLAT paper as a fully timed mock in the exact exam interface — 120 questions, 120 minutes, instant section-wise analysis afterwards.
Take a past paper as a mock

What the papers reveal, section by section

Read enough CLAT papers and durable patterns emerge. Here is what eight years of papers quietly teach about each of the five sections.

The single biggest lesson: in the modern papers, Legal Reasoning is principle-application, not law recall. The passage hands you the rule; your job is to apply it cleanly to a fresh set of facts — even if the 'law' in the passage differs from real law. Students who answer from what they think the law should be get punished; those who apply only the given principle score.

🧩 Worked example
Principle: A person who voluntarily accepts a known risk cannot later claim compensation for harm arising from that very risk. Facts: Ravi, an experienced spectator, sat in the front row at a cricket match knowing balls are sometimes hit into the stands. A six struck and injured him. He sued the stadium for compensation.

Is Ravi likely to succeed?

AYes, because the stadium owed every spectator a duty of safety.
BNo, because he voluntarily accepted a known risk of the game.
CYes, because he did not expect to be injured that day.
DNo, because cricket is a dangerous sport for everyone.
▸ Show solution
Answer: B. The principle is about voluntary acceptance of a known risk. Ravi was experienced and knew balls fly into the stands — he accepted that exact risk by choosing the front row. B applies the principle to the facts. A ignores the principle; C and D add reasoning the principle never mentions. Classic CLAT: apply only the given rule.

English Language

The papers reveal English as a pure reading-stamina test. There is no standalone grammar to revise for. You face dense ~450-word passages and answer on main idea, inference, tone and vocabulary-in-context. The challenge is staying sharp across passage after passage without your reading speed collapsing.

Current Affairs incl. GK

Post-2020, this section is also passage-led, and the papers reward reading stamina and informed reading over rote memory. A news passage sits in front of you; some questions are answerable straight from the text, others need a thin layer of static GK. A wide, steady reader scores far better than a last-minute crammer.

ℹ️ Use old GK questions as theme-spotters
The 2018–2019 static GK questions are dated as facts, but they reveal which themes CLAT keeps returning to — constitutional bodies, landmark cases, major schemes. Treat them as a map of recurring topics, not as facts to memorise.

Logical Reasoning

The papers show Logical Reasoning as short argument passages with questions on assumptions, inferences and strengthen/weaken. It is reasoning, not puzzles or heavy maths. The recurring lesson: stay inside the argument. The right answer follows from the passage's own logic, never from your outside opinion.

Quantitative Techniques

The smallest section, and the most misunderstood. The papers reveal Quant as short but data-interpretation heavy — a passage, table or graph followed by a cluster of questions. The maths is class-10 level: percentages, ratios, averages. The real test is reading the data correctly, not the calculation.

🧩 Worked example
A school of 800 students has 60% girls. Of all the girls, 25% opted for the science stream; of all the boys, 50% opted for science.

How many students in total opted for the science stream?

A280
B320
C360
D440
▸ Show solution
Answer: A. Girls = 60% of 800 = 480; boys = 320. Girls in science = 25% of 480 = 120. Boys in science = 50% of 320 = 160. Total = 120 + 160 = 280, so A. Pure class-10 percentages — the work is reading the data carefully, not hard maths.

What the papers teach about negative marking

CLAT marks +1 for a correct answer, −0.25 for a wrong one, and 0 for an unattempted one. The papers teach a calm, reassuring lesson worth taking to heart: you do not have to attempt everything. The penalty is small and the strategy is simple once you've seen it play out across a few real papers.

💡 The break-even truth
Because a wrong answer costs only −0.25, a guess breaks even if you're right roughly one time in five at random — and you're almost never guessing blind. If you can eliminate even two of four options using the passage, a reasoned guess gains marks on average. So eliminate, then commit.

The single most reassuring thing the papers reveal: top scorers are not the ones who attempt all 120 questions perfectly. They are the ones who secure the marks they can, eliminate intelligently on the rest, and refuse to panic. Sit a few real papers and this stops being theory — you feel it.

Every CLAT paper, 2018 to 2025

Here is every year's paper. Start with the recent 2020-onwards papers for the truest read of today's pattern, then use 2018 and 2019 for extra reading and concept practice. Each can be taken as a timed mock on the exam screen.

ℹ️ A sensible order to work through them
Sit 2025 first to baseline yourself against the latest pattern. Then work backwards through 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020 — analysing each fully before moving on. Save 2018 and 2019 for spare reading sessions and theme-spotting, and keep one recent paper unseen for a final dress rehearsal a week before the exam.

Turning papers into rank: a simple plan

Knowing the method is one thing; building it into a routine moves your rank. Here is a clean way to fold these eight papers into your final stretch of preparation.

  1. 1
    Baseline with the latest paper
    Sit the 2025 paper timed and score it honestly. This is your starting line — the gap between this score and your target is the work ahead. Log your section-wise accuracy before anything else.
  2. 2
    Work backwards, one paper a week
    Take one post-2020 paper per week, fully timed. Spend the rest of that week on the three-pass analysis — error log, passage re-reads, and targeted drills on your weakest section.
  3. 3
    Mine the old papers between mocks
    On lighter days, read the 2018–2019 passages for stamina and revise the legal principles and GK themes that recur. Treat these as practice, not as graded mocks.
  4. 4
    Dress rehearsal before the exam
    Keep one recent paper completely unseen. Sit it about a week before exam day at the real exam time, in full conditions. It rehearses your nerves, your pacing and your skip-strategy — the last things you want to debug on the day itself.
Put the three-pass method into action
Take any CLAT paper from 2018 to 2025 as a timed mock on the real exam screen, with full section-wise analysis to drive your error log.
Take a past paper as a mock
🎯 CLAT past papers in a nutshell
  • PYQs are the single most valuable resource — they reveal real difficulty, passage length, question style and stamina better than any guidebook.
  • CLAT was redesigned in 2020 from direct, static questions to a fully comprehension-based exam across all five sections.
  • Treat 2020 onwards as the truest guide to today's pattern; use 2018–2019 mainly for reading and concept practice.
  • Use each paper in three passes: take it once strictly timed, analyse every wrong answer against the passage, then redo the passages you misread.
  • Track section-wise accuracy across papers — the trend, not the single score, is your real progress report.
  • Section truths: Legal Reasoning is principle-application not law recall; English and Current Affairs reward reading stamina; Quant is short but data-interpretation heavy.
  • Negative marking is gentle — eliminate two options and a reasoned guess gains marks; don't over-skip from fear.

Frequently asked questions

Are CLAT past papers enough to crack the exam?
They are the most important resource, but not the only one. Past papers reveal the real pattern, difficulty and question style better than anything else, so they should anchor your preparation. Pair them with daily current-affairs reading and topic-wise drills on your weak sections. Solve the papers properly — timed, then fully analysed — and they will do most of the heavy lifting.
How many years of CLAT papers should I solve?
Solve all the post-2020 papers — 2020 to 2025 — as your core, timed practice, because they match today's comprehension-based format exactly. Use the 2018 and 2019 papers for extra reading and concept revision rather than as pattern guides. That gives you six true-format mocks plus two papers of bonus reading and theme-spotting practice.
Is the old CLAT pattern still relevant?
Partly. CLAT changed in 2020 from direct, static questions to a fully comprehension-based exam, so the 2018 and 2019 papers no longer mirror the current pattern. They remain useful for reading practice, revising legal principles, and spotting recurring GK and case-law themes — just don't judge your readiness by your score on them. The 2020-onwards papers are your true benchmark.
What changed in CLAT from 2020?
The Consortium of NLUs redesigned the exam. Before 2020, CLAT leaned on direct, single-fact recall questions. From 2020, every section became passage-based: you read a passage and answer questions on it, including Legal Reasoning, where the principle is given and you apply it. The shift rewards reading speed, comprehension and application over memory.
Where can I take these CLAT papers as timed mocks?
Right here. Every paper from 2018 to 2025 on this page can be taken as a fully timed mock on the real CLAT exam-screen interface — 120 questions in 120 minutes, with +1/−0.25 marking and section-wise analysis afterwards. Sitting them in real exam conditions is what turns a past paper into genuine improvement.
How should I analyse a CLAT paper after solving it?
Use three passes. First, take it once strictly timed with no peeking. Second, for every wrong answer go back to the passage and find the exact line that forces the right answer and the line that should have warned you off yours, then log the cause. Third, a few days later, redo the passages you misread. Track your section-wise accuracy across papers to see the trend.
How do I handle negative marking in CLAT?
CLAT marks +1 for a correct answer, −0.25 for a wrong one and 0 for a blank. Because the penalty is small, a guess pays off once you can eliminate even two of the four options using the passage — which is the usual situation. Skip only the questions where you can eliminate nothing. Don't over-skip from fear, and never rush the last passages, since panic causes more errors than guessing.

Ready to practise?

Free CLAT UG drills, sectional tests and full mocks in the real exam-screen format — timer, palette, instant scoring and solutions.

Take a past paper as a mock →